After viewing the two different film versions, the most important thing that stuck out to me was the symbolism provided by the ever present clocks in each. The clocks were in every scene of each film. The characters always seemed to be aware of the time. In the 1960 version, the men were concerned that their host was late for dinner and that they had other, more important things to attend to. In the second film, the main charcter was late for a meeting with his gilfriend and this caused all of the events of her death to be set in motion. More than once in each film, the phrase "Time controls us or makes us prisoners, etc" was noticed. This is so true. It was true for both time periods in which these films were created and it still holds true today. We are controlled by time everyday, especially as Americans. It is always "how fast can we get this job done" and "how long will you have to give workers for breaks" etc.
Americans live fast-paced lives, more so than most other countries. Therefore, the thinking of technology did change somewhat between films. In the first, the characters saw no use for a time travel machine. They even questioned how one could market such an invention. However, in the second film, the use for time travel becomes much more obvious. Second, I found the technology portrayed in the films to be very similar. The modes of transportation (horse and buggy) were present in each film. This only changed slightly in the newer film version when the main character sees an automobile for the first time. Of course, when he travels to the future, we as viewers see the presence of technology and how it changes throughout time. This shows how our view of the world as a society changed. We became a society intrigued by the "next big thing." We want everything and we want it fast. Hence the slogan in the second film-"the future is now." We have to have the future at our fingertips, there is no waiting for it to arrive
Americans live fast-paced lives, more so than most other countries. Therefore, the thinking of technology did change somewhat between films. In the first, the characters saw no use for a time travel machine. They even questioned how one could market such an invention. However, in the second film, the use for time travel becomes much more obvious. Second, I found the technology portrayed in the films to be very similar. The modes of transportation (horse and buggy) were present in each film. This only changed slightly in the newer film version when the main character sees an automobile for the first time. Of course, when he travels to the future, we as viewers see the presence of technology and how it changes throughout time. This shows how our view of the world as a society changed. We became a society intrigued by the "next big thing." We want everything and we want it fast. Hence the slogan in the second film-"the future is now." We have to have the future at our fingertips, there is no waiting for it to arrive


This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree that are we generally still searching for the "next big thing". But I had the feeling that the 2002 version gave as a hint that we were moving past that. The motivation for money is still there as it will always be, but the second version seemed to quickly communicate that money is not the strongest motivation.
ReplyDeleteHi Dawn
ReplyDeleteI share your thoughts about the "future in our fingerprints" and agree about the value of time that has never changed. I felt like in the newer version of the movie technology is more of a commodity, though. Remember that machine that the professor was staring at on the way to his date? It felt like the sense of technology as a tool was more vivid in the newer version; the tool that filfills some sort of a purpose and is more understood and accepted by the society than in the older movie.
Dawn,
ReplyDeleteI like your comparison on the obvious and unclear purpose of the use of thime machine in the movies. The older version, the audience is left with a question mark, which makes it harder for us to keep the excitement to continue to watch the rest of the movie. While we could not make any connection since the transitions between the secenes are not very clear in the first movie, I have found myself so drawn to the newer version of the movie in which there was no confusing part, which kept me more intested in what would come next.
The student-centered focus is key. What can we do as instructors to do more than talk the talk on this subject? You are right when you say that the wiki would be a powerful tool to move toward this best of all possible learning environments: the student-centered classroom.
ReplyDeleteDawn, do you think it'd be possible for us to find a way to have our students post things on the internet that their own classmates would NEVER see? How might THIS change their writing--if they didn't have to worry at all about expressing vulnerable things to people who know them?
ReplyDelete